Dennis Holloway, Architect, An Architect in Northern New Mexico


Back to Information List | Home
A Simple Design Methodology
for Passive Solar Architecture
By Dennis R. Holloway (the die-hard solar architect!)
Author's Note: The following information is a precipitation of knowledge
acquired through my practice and research in the 1970's regarding the use
of solar energy to 'passively' heat and cool buildings. I believe that continuing
dissemination of this information through the Internet is very important
in a time when earth's bio-environment is so endangered by the continued
combustion of fossil fuel into the atmosphere. Please copy this page and
distribute it freely.
The ancient discovery that the shadow of a "gnomon"--an arrow
stuck vertically into the ground--mirrored the perfectly symmetrical path
of the sun across the sky is as important to the development of civilization
as the discovery of the wheel. By studying the movements of this shadow
people first conceived of the 90o (right) angle--the foundation of geometry,
and ultimately of architecture. A result of this "shadow science"
origin is that most architecture and city street grids are related to the
north-south east-west axes. The ancients also gained great insights into
the potential of architecture to modify the sun's shadow and radiant heat.
Indeed, using the sun as a heat source is nothing new. In XENOPHON'S
MEMORABILIA, written 2400 years ago, Socrates observed:
"Now in houses with a south aspect, the sun's rays penetrate into the
porticos in winter, but in the summer, the path of the sun is right over
our heads and above the roof, so that there is shade. If then this is the
best arrangement, we should build the south side loftier to get the winter
sun and the north side lower to keep out the winter winds. To put it shortly,
the house in which the owner can find a pleasant retreat at all seasons
and can store his belongings safely is presumably at once the pleasantest
and the most beautiful."
While the Greek house that Socrates described probably lost heat as fast
as it was collected, due to convective and radiation losses, the Romans
discovered that if the south-facing portico and windows were covered with
glass, the solar energy would be trapped causing the internal temperature
to stay constant into the night. This simple phenomenon called the "greenhouse
effect" is illustrated by the experience of returning to your car on
a sunny, cool day and finding it overheated. Today we call the house that
uses the greenhouse effect for heating a "passive solar house."
It is a common rule-of-thumb that, compared to a conventionally designed
house of the same square footage, a well-designed passive solar house can
reduce energy bills by 75% with an added construction cost of only 5-10%.
In many parts of the U.S. passive solar houses do not require any auxiliary
energy for heating and cooling. Given current and future projected fuel
costs, the additional construction cost is recovered quickly. Official surveys
show 100,000 passive solar homes in the U.S.(1984), but informal estimates
bring to one million the number of buildings that employ some aspects of
passive solar design, often south-facing greenhouses.
Figure 1: Potential for passive solar heating in the United States.
Characteristics of a Passive Solar House
The Passive Solar House has some distinctive design features:
1. In the northern hemisphere most of its windows are facing the south (in
the southern hemisphere its windows face north). Solar radiation, mostly
the visible light spectrum, passes through the solar-oriented glass of windows
or solar spaces, and is absorbed by surfaces of materials inside the insulated
envelope of the building. As these heated surfaces re-radiate the energy
into the interior of the house, the air temperature rises, but the heat
is not efficiently re-radiated outside again through the glass, nor can
the heated air escape, so the result is entrapped energy.
2. Ideally, the interior surfaces that the light strikes are high density
materials, such as concrete, brick, stone, or adobe. These materials, because
of the "flywheel" effect (the ability to absorb energy and re-readiate
it over time), can store the energy for constant slow re-radiation, resulting
in a very smooth temperature swing curve for the building, and reducing
the possibility of overheating the air in the house. In this way a large
portion of the houses' heating requirements can be supported by the sun.
3. In the early passive solar houses of the 70's, architects and builders
tended to reduce window areas on the east, west, and north sides of the
house in favor of southern orientation. This is still the general rule-of-thumb,
but the introduction of energy conserving and radiation-modifying films,
available in several major window lines (see Chapter 6, p. 57f), enables
designers and builders to relax this rule. This is good news on sites with
attractive views other than to the south. West windows are a source of high
heat gain during the summer, and should be shaded. Generally, the house
plan with a long east-west axis and optimized south-facing wall will be
the best passive solar house.
4. Passive solar homes tend to be well insulated and have reduced air leakage
rates, to keep the solar heat within the building envelope.
5. Since auxiliary heat requirements are greatly reduced in a passive solar
home compared to a conventional home, smaller, direct-vented units or a
woodstove for extended cloudy periods are often the heaters of choice.
6. Passive solar homes often have "open floor plans" to facilitate
the "thermosiphing" movement of solar heat from the south side
through the rest of the house. Sometimes small fans are used to aid in warm
air distribution in houses with "closed floor plans".
Passive Solar Techniques 1: Direct Gain
There are two basic ways passive solar houses gain solar energy, direct
and indirect gain. Direct gain houses, considered to be the simplest type,
rely on south-facing windows, called solar windows. These can be conventionally
manufactured operable or fixed windows on the south wall of the house or
standard-dimension insulating glass panels in the wall of the sunspace or
solarium. While some of the heat is used immediately, walls, floors, ceilings,
and furniture store the excess heat, which radiates into the space throughout
the day and night. In all cases the performance and comfort of the direct
gain space will increase if the thermal mass (concrete, concrete block,
brick, or adobe) within the space is increased.
Figure 2: A direct gain passive solar house (Design by Dennis Holloway,
Architect, for Ellen and Matt Champion)
J. Douglas Balcomb and his research team at Los Alamos National Laboratory
recommend that the mass be spread over the largest practical area in the
direct gain space. It is preferable to locate the thermal mass in direct
sunlight (heated by radiation) but the mass that is located out of the direct
sunlight (heated by air convection) is also important for overall performance.
Thermal mass storage is as much as four times as effective when the mass
is located so that the sun shines directly on it and it is subject to convective
heating from warmed air as compared to only being heated by convection.
The recommended mass surface-to-glass area ratio is 6 : 1. In general,
comfort and performance increase with increase of thermal mass, and there
is no upper limit for the amount of thermal mass.
Remember, covering the mass with materials such as carpet, cork, wallboard,
or other materials with R-values greater than 0.5 will effectively insulate
the mass from the solar energy you're trying to collect. Materials such
as ceramic floor tiles or brick make better choices for covering a direct
gain slab. Tiles should be attached to the slab with a mortar adhesive and
grouted (with complete contact) to the slab.
In direct gain storage thin mass is more effective than thick mass. The
most effective thickness in masonry materials is the first four inches--thickness
beyond 6" is pointless. The most effective thickness in wood is the
first inch.
Locating thermal mass in interior partitions is more effective than exterior
partitions, assuming both have equal solar access, because on the internal
wall heat can transfer on both surfaces. The most effective internal storage
wall masses are those located between two direct gain spaces.
Figure 3: Internal mass storage walls serve as north-south partitions
between direct -gain spaces (a) and as east-west partitions between direct-gain
sunspaces and north clerestory space (b).
Lightweight objects and surfaces of low density materials should be light
in color to reflect energy to high density materials. If more than one-half
of the walls in a direct gain space are massive, then they should be light
in color. If the mass is concentrated in a single wall, then its color should
be dark--unless its surface is struck early in the day by sunlight, in which
case its color should be light to diffuse the the light and heat into the
rest of the space. Massive floors should be dark in color to store the heat
low. Clerestory windows should be located so that the sunlight strikes low
into the space. If the sunlight from the clerestory first strikes high in
the space, then the wall surface should be light in color to diffuse the
light and heat downwards into the space.
In northern climates moveable insulation in the form of drapes, panels,
shutters, and quilts often are used to cover the inside of the glass on
winter nights to reduce heat loss. Because so much high-angle summer sun
is reflected off vertical south-facing glass, heat gain is greatly reduced
in the warm season, overhanging eaves for shading may not be as crucial
as the early passive solar designers thought.
Since inhabitants will see out through the glass, this technique is good
for the site with good southerly views. Some people object to the intense
glare in direct gain rooms and fading of furniture fabrics can be a disadvantage.
Privacy can also be a problem, since if the occupants can see out through
the expanses of glass, the rest of the world can look in.
Besides providing warmth in the winter, a well-designed passive house should
provide coolth and good ventilation in the summer. In some quarters there
is a stubbornly persistent myth, a holdover from the news media coverage
of some of the early passive houses, that overheating in summer is common
in these houses.
Architects and builders have discovered that a two-storey solar space or
greenhouse, adjoining the main house, with operable vent windows near the
top and bottom of the space can be used to create natural ventilation for
the house during summer. When the windows are open on a sunny day, the rising
mass of warmed air is allowed to escape through the opened top vents which
in turn draws in cooler air through the lower vents or through windows in
the adjacent house. Called the chimney effect, this principle, employed
to cool the Indian Tipi, can also keep your passive solar house cool in
any U.S. summer climate without the use of powered fans or mechanical air-conditioning.
Shading devices used on the south side of the house can also help. Pull-down
shades or canvas awnings on the outside of the glass of the south-facing
windows, solarium, and trombe walls can greatly reduce house heat gain.
Deciduous trees and shrubs planted to cast shadows on solar-oriented glazing
can also create a micro-climate that is several degrees cooler than surrounding
areas. When the leaves drop, winter sun can shine into the house.
Direct-Gain Sunspaces
A popular direct gain heating strategy is the sunspace. Many homeowners
claim this room becomes the favorite space in the house with its spacious
outdoor feeling. The sunspace/greenhouse can, if properly designed and sited,
provide as much as 50% of the house's heating requirements. In this situation,
living spaces are better located on the south side with spaces (like bedrooms)
not requiring as much heat to the north. Clerestory windows can be used
in larger houses where it is important to get sunlight into the northside
rooms.
Figure 4a: One-story sunspaces: winter, sunspace cut off from the
house (Section A); winter, sunspave helps the lower story via open doors
(SectionB); summer, sunspace helps cool the lower story by pulling in air
from the north windows (Section C).
Figure 4b: Two-story sunspace: winter, sunspace cut off from the house
(Section A); winter, sunspace helps heat both stories of the house (SectionB);
summer, sunspace helps cool booth stories(SectionC).
If you plan to include a sunspace in your design, you'll first need to decide
on the primary function of the space. The design considerations for a food-growing
greenhouse, a living space and a supplementary solar heater are very different,
and although it is possible to build a sunspace that will serve all three
functions, compromises will be necessary.
The Sunspace / Greenhouse
A greenhouse, for instance, should be a comfortable and healthy home for
plants. Plants need fresh air, water, lots of light, and protection from
extreme temperatures. Greenhouses consume considerable amounts of energy
through evapotranspiration and the evaporation of water. One pound of evaporating
water uses about 1,000 BTU's of energy that would otherwise be available
as heat.
To stay healthy and free of insects and disease, plants need adequate ventilation,
even in winter. There are air handling systems such as air-to-air heat exchangers
that ventilate while retaining most of the heat in the air, but these add
significantly to the cost of the project. The light requirements of a space
for growing plants call for overhead glazing which complicates construction
and maintenance, and glazed end walls, which are net heat losers.
There will be some economic gains from reduced grocery bills if you grow
vegetables, and certainly there is much to be said for the sense of satisfaction
that comes with increased self-reliance and the aesthetics of a roomful
of healthy plants attached to your house. The bottom line in terms of energy
efficiency, however, is that a sunspace designed as an ideal horticultural
environment is unlikely to have any energy left for supplementary space
heating.
Solar Heat Collector
If the purpose of the sunspace is to collect solar heat and distribute it
effectively to the adjacent living space, you're faced with a different
set of design criteria. Maximum gain is achieved with sloped glazing, few
plants, and insulated, unglazed end walls.
Remember that you'll get more usable heat into your living space if there
aren't plants and lots of mass soaking it up in the sunspace. Sun-warmed
air can be moved into the house through doors or operable windows in the
common wall, as well as blown through ductwork to more remote areas.
Living Space
If your sunspace will be a living space, you'll need to consider comfort,
convenience, and space in addition to energy efficiency. A room you plan
to live in must stay warm in the winter, cool in the summer, have minimum
glare levels, and moderate humidity.
Vertical glazing is the choice of increasing numbers of designers for a
variety of reasons. First of all, although sloped glazing collects more
heat in the winter, it also loses significantly more heat at night, which
offsets the daytime gains. Sloped glazing can also overheat in warmer weather,
usually the spring and fall, when you don't want the gain.
The performance of a vertical glazed south wall more closely follows the
demands of heating degree days, heating effectively in winter when the angle
of the sun is low and allowing less solar gain as the sun rises toward its
summer zenith. A well-designed overhang may be all that's necessary to keep
the sun out when it's not needed. Vertical glazing is also cheaper and easier
to install and insulate, and is not as prone to leaking, fogging, breakage
and other glazing failures.
A sunspace designed for living requires carefully sized thermal mass, and,
as we mentioned earlier, special care must be taken to assure that the sun
can get to the mass. A masonry floor covered with carpets and furniture
is obviously not as effective a thermal mass as masonry sitting in direct
sunlight.
Once the sun goes down, the same windows that collected heat all day begin
to reradiate heat to the outdoors. To minimize nighttime losses and maximize
comfort (the human body also radiates heat to a cool surface), you may want
to include movable window insulation in your design or investigate some
of the new high tech glazings now commercially available
Design Guidelines
Regardless of the design strategy you choose, there are some other criteria
that are important to consider. Much of the following information is taken
from The Sunspace Primer: A Guide to Passive Solar Heating, by Robert W.
Jones and Robert D. McFarland, (Van Nostrand Reinhold Co., New York, New
York, 1984).
Glazing:
The ideal orientation for the glazing in your sunspace is due solar south,
although an orientation within 30o east or west of due south is acceptable.
For maximum solar gain, the glass should be tilted 50-60o from the horizon.
Many designers, depending on their design strategy, prefer vertical glazing,
or a combination of vertical and sloped glazing.
Vertical south-facing glass has advantages over angled glazing in not having
to be sealed against water leakage and in its capacity to reflect unwanted
(high angle) summer sun, but its winter performance is 10-30% lower that
tilted glass of the same area. (Vertically glazed space, can be used like
most other rooms in the house, whereas tilted glazing results in head height
problems sometimes). The efficiency of a sunspace that combines vertical
and some angled roof glazing will be higher than the vertically glazed sunspace,
while retaining the advantages of vertical glazing. Rain and snow will clean
the outdside of the tilted glass pretty well, whereas vertical glass has
the same maintenance problems as house windows. A two-to-three foot wide
edging of pea gravel below sunspace glazing that is close to the ground,
will prevent soil from splashing onto the glass, which can reduce efficiency.
Figure 5: Sunspace with sloped south-wall glazing over reverse-slope
vent windows (a). Sunspace with vertical south-wall glazing (sliding door),
side venting windows, and sloped roof glazing (b). (Design by Dennis Holloway,
Architect)
Heat Storage:
If the sunspace is deeper than it is high, the space itself will trap the
radiation, so lighter surface colors are acceptable. Otherwise, the surfaces
of heat storage materials (thermal mass) should be dark colors of at least
70 percent absorptance. To give you some perspective on the relative absorptance
of various colors, black has an absorptance of about 95 percent, a deep
blue about 90 percent, and deep red about 86 percent. Non-storage materials
should be lighter colors, so they will reflect light to the thermal mass
that isn't in the sun.
The floor, north wall, and east and west side walls are good locations for
mass walls, which should be materials with a high thermal conductivity such
as concrete, water, brick, adobe, or rammed earth. "Light weight"
concrete is not acceptable as a thermal mass material, and concrete is most
effective in 4 to 6 inch thicknesses. If concrete blocks are used, the cores
must be grouted solid.

Figure 6: Sunspace thermal storage (a) Provide 3 square feet of concrete
(b) or 3 gallons of water (c) for each square foot of glazing.
If the masonry floor and wall mass are the only thermal storage materials
in the space, three square feet of masonry surface per square foot of south
glazing is the recommended ratio. If water in containers is the only heat
storage medium used, the recommended ratio is three gallons per square foot
of glazing.
Increasing the amount of mass will stabilize the internal temperatures,
making the space more comfortable for people and plants. A common strategy
is to use an 8 to 12 inch uninsulated masonry wall as the north wall of
the sunspace. The wall is left uninsulated so that the heat from the sunspace
can be conducted through to the interior of the house.
Conservation
If the sunspace is to be used for growing plants or as a living space, a
minimum of double glazing is recommended. Single glazing loses a great deal
of heat at night, and will make the space uncomfortable for plants and people.
Movable insulation or a higher-R glazing system will greatly improve the
performance of the glazing.
Either of these options add to the cost of the project, and the obvious
disadvantage of movable insulation is that someone has to move it every
day , and some designers refuse to use it because of an "objectionalble
appearance"--something this industry has not been creative about. On
the other hand, it is possible to have the insulation controlled automatically
with motors and thermostats, and insulation can provide privacy, summer
shading, and increased comfort on cold winter nights.
Distribution
To distribute the warmed air from the sunspace to the rest of the house,
openings are strategically placed in the common wall between the sunspace
and the interior living space. Heat is transferred by the "thermosiphoning"
circulation of the air. Warm air rises in the sunspace, passes into the
adjoining space through the opening and cool air from the adjoining space
is drawn into the sunspace to be heated as the cycle repeats.
If the openings are 6'8" doors, the minimum recommended opening is
8 square feet of opening per 100 square feet of glazing area. If two openings
are used--one high in the sunspace, one low--with 8 vertical feet of separation,
the recommended minimum area for each opening is 2.5 square feet per 100
square feet of glazing.
Controls
Sunspaces can radically overheat resulting in dead plants and unusable living
spaces if operable vents are not included in the overall design. As we mentioned,
overheating is most likely to occur in the late summer and early fall, when
the sun is lower in the sky and the outside air temperature is still warm
during the day.
Vents are placed at the top of the sunspace where the temperature is the
highest, and at the bottom of the space where temperatures are the lowest
to induce the chimney effect. Thermostatically controlled motors can be
installed to open the vents automatically if no one will be home to operate
them.
These paired vents should be sized according to the following specified
fraction of the sunspace glazing area. The required vent area is a function
of the glass slope, the vertical distance between the top and bottom vents
(stack height), and the rise in internal temperature over outdoor temperature
that can be tolerated in the sunspace. The last column in the chart gives
fan sizes that will provide the same ventilation.
Few design strategies offer the aesthetic appeal and practical paybacks
that a carefully thought out and constructed sunspace does. In our view,
it is money well spent to take your preliminary design to a solar engineer
or architect for feedback and a computer analysis. It is much less expensive
to make changes on paper than to alter a design once it's built.
Passive Solar Techniques 2: Indirect Gain
The second passive solar house type, indirect gain, collects and stores
energy in one part of the house and uses natural heat movement to warm the
rest of the house. One of the more ingenious indirect gain designs employs
the thermal storage wall, or Trombe wall placed three or four inches inside
an expanse of south facing glass. Named after its French inventor, Felix
Trombe, the wall is constructed of high density materials--masonry, stone,
brick, adobe, or water-filled containers--and is painted a dark color (like
black, deep red, brown, purple or green) to more efficiently absorb the
solar radiation.
Some designers use "selective surface" materials, chrome-anodized
copper or aluminum foils with adhesive backing that can increase the absorbtive
efficiency of the wall to 90%, compared to 60% for a painted surface. These
materials allow the wall to absorb radiant heat, but drastically reduce
the amount of heat that is lost by radiation to the outdoors at night.
Some builders have had difficulty getting good adhesion between commercially
available selective surface foils and the Trombe wall. According to the
July 1, 1985 Solar Energy Intelligence Report, Los Alamos National Laboratory
is testing a selective surface paint that may hold promise. If you would
like to know more about it, contact the National Technical Information Service,
5285 Port Royal Road, Springfield, VA 22161, (703)487-4600, and ask for
the report on "Thickness Insensitive Selective Surface Paint."
The paint can be brushed or sprayed on, and performs in range of 10-20 percent
better than flat black paint.
Heat collected and stored in the wall during the day, slowly radiates into
the house even up to 24 hours later. The Trombe wall allows efficient solar
heating without the elare and ultra-violet light damage to fabrics and wood
trim that is common in direct gain solar homes. Trombe walls also afford
privacy in situations where that is an issue.
Perhaps the most useful book on passive solar design for owner-builders
is THE PASSIVE SOLAR ENERGY BOOK, by Edward Mazria, who makes the
following recommendations for sizing the Trombe Wall: "In cold climates
(average winter temperatures 20o to 30o F) use between 0.43 and 1.0 square
feet of south-facing, double-glazed, masonry thermal storage wall (0.31
and 0.65 square feet for a water wall) for each one square foot of floor
space area. In temperate climates (average winter temperatures 35o to 45o
F) use between 0.22 and 0.6 square feet of thermal wall (0.16 and 0.43 square
feet for a water wall) for each one square foot of space floor area."
Trombe Wall Vents:
In several of the earliest published Trombe wall houses, small vents were
used in the top and bottom of the wall; heated air in the wall air space
would rise and pass through the upper vent into the high space of the room,
while cooler air from low in the room would be drawn into the wall air space
through the low wall vent to form a convective heating loop. This is particularly
effective in a building where heat is required quickly. The convective movement
of air in the wall results in a significant decrease in efficiency over
time. Vented Trombe walls are known to be only about 5% more efficient,
overall, than non-vented Trombe walls. Therefore, for residences, non-vented
Trombe walls are recommended.
Designing the Passive Solar House
When the term, "passive solar" was introduced into the language
of professional solar researchers in the 1970's, most people didn't have
a vague notion what it meant. Later, as the term was popularized by the
media and through a large number of public educational conferences, people
probably thought that if they wanted to build a passive solar house they
would have to hire not only an architect, but a professional solar engineer
capable of manipulating very complex mathematical equations on a computer.
Today, thanks primarily to knowledge gained from government-funded research
and a large number of completed "pioneer" passive solar houses
that we've collected data from, we are at the stage where even a high school
student can design a passive solar structure. Following is a composite of
recently published information to get the owner-builder on the path to owner-designing
the passive solar house.
Passive Solar Preliminary Design Rules of Thumb
Orientation:
Remember that "solar south" is different from "magnetic south."
The longest wall of the house should ideally be facing due (solar) south
to receive the maximum winter and minimum summer heat gains. However, the
south wall can be as much as 30o east or west of solar south with only a
15% decrease in efficiency from the optimum.
Figure 7:When designing a solar home, you must locate true (solar)
south, not magnetic south. This map shows how magnetic south varies from
true south in different parts of the United States.
Buffer Zone:
Design your house so that rooms with relatively low heat and light requirements,
those that get infrequent use (storage, utility room, garage, e.g.), and
those rooms that generate high internal heat (kitchen) are located on the
north side of the house to reduce winter heat load.
In 1983 J. Douglas Balcomb and the research team at Los Alamos National
Laboratory issued a set of direct gain and indirect gain design guidelines
for heating passive solar houses located in the U.S. They included information
on infiltration rates and selecting R-values for the walls, ceiling, perimeter,
and basement. They also made suggestions about what kinds of glazings to
use for east, west and north windows, as well as about how to size the solar
collection area.
The technique is not a substitute for more rigorous computer-simulated thermal
analysis by a professional engineer, but it gives owner-builders a solid
basis for the schematic design decisions. It is an elegant if oversimplified
tool for deciding on a good mix of conservation and passive solar strategies
based on geographical location. The five-step technique has been distilled
from theoretical analysis and from data collected at actual passive solar
houses.
STEP 1: Conservation Levels
Locate your building site on the map (Figure 8) to select the Conservation
Factor (CF) to be used in your house design. Note that for each geographic
zone the CF is expressed as a range. If your fuel costs are high (and whose
aren't nowadays!), select the highest number.

Figure 8: Use this map to find your conservation factor (CF). (Source:
J. Douglas Balcolm, et al.)
STEP 2: Recommended Insulation Values and Infiltration Rates
Use the following formulas to determine insulation values and recommended
infiltration rates. (CF is the conservation factor you selected in the first
step.)
Wall R values: Multiply the CF by 14. This is the R-value for the
entire wall, includeing insulation, siding, interior sheathing, etc.
Ceiling R-values: Multiply the CF by 22. This is the R-value for
the entire ceiling, including insulation, finish surface, etc.
R-value of rigid insulation placed on the perimeter of a slab foundation:
Multiply CF by 13. Subtract 5 from this number. Use the same value for the
insulation of the floor above a crawl space or for the perimeter insulation
outside an exposed stem wall.
R-value of rigid insulation applied to the outside of the wall of a heated
basement or bermed wall: Multiply CF by 16. Subtract 8 from this number.
Use theis value for insulation extending to 4 feet below grade. Use half
this R-value from 4 feet below grade down to the footing.
Target ACH (Air Changes/Hour): Divide .42 by the CF. If the result
is lower than 0.5ACH, choose tight superinsulation techniques with controlled
ventilation to maintain indoor air quality.
Layers of glazing on east, west, and north windows: Multiply the
CF by 1.7, then choose the closest whole number. (If the number is 2.3 ,
choose windows with three layers.) If the number exceeds 3. explore insulating
glass and/or movable insulation.
Based on guidance from results of these formulas, select your conservation
levels, trying to stay within 20% of the results. Your budget will be your
best guide, but remember that conservation pays in the short and long run,
so when in doubt, opt for higher conservation levels.
STEP 3: Net Load Coefficient
We next compute a Net Load Coefficient (NLC). To do this, look up
your home's geometry factor (GF) in Table 1 (below). For example, if the
house will have a total floor area of nearly 3000 square feet on three stories,
the GF will be 5.7.
Now multiply the GF by your house's floor area. Thus, if the floor area
will be 2900 square feet and the GF is 5.7, you multiply these two values
to get 16,530. Finally, divide this result by the CF. If your CF is 2.0,
for example you would divide 16,530 by 2 to get 8265. This is your NLC.
Table 1: Geometry Factor, GF
STEP 4: Load Collector Ratio
Locate your building site on the following Load Collector Ratio (LCR) map
(Figure 9). This will give you the lad collector ration (LCR) for your home.
Note that for each geographic zone, the LCR is expressed as a range. If
your fuel costs are high, select the lowest number.

Figure 9: Use this map to find your load collector ratio (LCR). (Source:
J. Douglas Balcomb, et. al.)
STEP 5: Passive Solar Glazing Area
To determine the area of the passive solar collector (Trombe wall, sunspace,
etc.) for your home, divide the NLC (the number you got in step 3) by the
LCR (the number you got in Step 4). For example, if your NLC is 8.265 and
your LCR is 20, then your passive solar collector should have 423 square
feet of south-facing glazing. You can round this number up or down by 10
percent (so the area could be as small as 370 square feet or as large as
450 square feet.) In hot climates, the areas should be adjusted downward
by 20 to 30 percent.
Passive Solar Concepts
Elements most commonly used in passive solar homes to make maximum use of
the sun's heat include direct-gain windows, direct gain glazed solariums,
and indirect-gain Trombe walls and mass wall. Each of these elements will
influence the design because they have specific requirements.
"Direct-Gain" windows allow sunlight to enter the home directly.
Much of the heat from the sunlight should be absorbed by some type of high-density
material such as masonry; after sunset, the heat will flow out of this "thermal
mass", helping to keep the house warm. Direct-gain windows should be
oriented due south, although the orientation may be varied by as much as
30 degrees east or west of south without losing much efficiency. Southerly
views from the building site become an important criterion in site selection--you
don't want huge southern windows showing you unattrative views. Because
many furniture fabrics and carpets are susceptible to fading in sunlight,
and because these materials tend to prevent the light from reaching masonry
floors where its warmth can be stored, you should keep such fabrics our
of direct sunlight.

Figure 10: A large south-oriented glass wall and high vents (a); A
Trombe wall (b); A two-story sunspace (c). Thermal mass is shown as solid
black and speckled areas.
The direct gain solarium (otherwise known as a solar greenhouse or sunspace)
is similar in concept to teh direct-gain window, and the same orientation
rules of thumb apply. The typical early solarium of the 1970s projected
out from the house, like na addition, and was glazed on the south, east,
and west sides as well as the roof. The south wall was typically sloped.
Today's solarium has been modified for greater efficiency and typically
is flush with the south wall of the house, therby eliminating the loss of
energy from the east and west walls. Surrounded by other spaces, the solarium
space can be an effective focus for the house, functioning like a solar
"hearth". To minimize the overheating common in the early style
solarium, the roof is not glazed and the south wall is vertical rather than
sloped. The state-of-the-art solarium is sometimes a two-storey space, with
French doors opening to rooms on both levels, allowing better circulation
of solar-heated air throughout the house.

Figure 11: Orientation to true south in a passive solar house may
vary by as much as 30 degrees east or west of south with relatively little
loss of overall efficiency (top); A direct-gain system, such as a sunspace
(a), floods a space with light, which may cause fabrics to fade. An indirect-gain
system, such as a Trombe wall (b), provides heat while blocking the light.

Figure 12: First generation sunspaces (a) usually protruded from the
house. New sunspaces (b) are often two story designs set into a house's
south wall.
A Trombe wall is a masonry wall with glazing spaced a few inches outside
it. Solar heat is trapped between the masonry and the glass; it enters the
house by migrating through the masonry. Whereas the direct-gain window and
solarium are virtually transparent,creating strong spatial connections between
indoors and outdoors, the Trombe wall obstructs views to the outdoors, so
it works well on a site where a southern view is not desireable. If you
do want a south view, however, yu can place windows in a Trombe wall. Variations
on the Trombe wall include half-Trombe walls with direct-gain windows above,
and Trambe walls with integral fireplaces. A Trombe wall can also be "bent"
or shaped to fit the internal requirements of the floor plan.

Figure 13: Trombe walls can be designed to fit virtually any south-facing
wall.
The design of a multilevel passive solar house should take into account
the fact that there will be some degree of heat stratification, with warmer
upper level spaces and cooler lower level spaces. Thus the spaces on the
upper level might include the living, cooking, and family activity arieas
where most of the waking hours are spent, and the lower level spaces could
be used for sleeping. Although this "upstairs / downstairs" relationship
seems unconventional to us, it offers a better view from the living space
and is ideal for a hillside house with entry on the north side of the house
and the north walls of the lower level sheltered by the hill.
The Future of Passive Solar Houses
The emergence in the 70's of the passive solar house, in all its variations,
was a dramatic display of Yankee ingenuity applied to the national energy
crisis, and our knowledge about the solar-thermal performance of buildings
was extended by a quantum leap. But at this writing, the political pendulum
and its news media has swung away from passive solar architecture, as the
Federal solar tax credits quietly are put to bed.
With all the current talk of an emerging energy-glutted decade, the potential
owner builder may wonder if making an energy efficiency statement in a new
home makes any sense. We surely have to see through this cloud to know that
energy shortfall in the 70's will pale by comparison to what lies ahead
in the 90's. The growing movement of clear-sighted owner builders will continue
to show the rest of the population that our living room comfort can, by
connecting to our abundant ambient solar energy, release us from the tyranny
of tenuous foreign energy supplies.
In a recent interview, Douglas Balcomb, our foremost passive solar researcher-spokesperson,
said that the viability of passive solar has become an established fact,
and the use of direct-gain spaces, sunspaces, and Trombe walls (in that
order) will be with us for a long time.
Your comments and feedback are welcome. Please contact me via
e-mail:
archvr@cybermesa.com

Top of Page